> We generalize Einstein's General Relativity (GR) by assuming that all matter (including macro-objects) has quantum effects. An appropriate theory to fulfill this task is Gauge Theory Gravity (GTG) developed by the Cambridge group. GTG is a "spin-torsion" theory, according to which, gravitational effects are described by a pair of gauge fields defined over a flat Minkowski background spacetime. The matter content is completely described by the Dirac spinor field, and the quantum effects of matter are identified as the spin tensor derived from the spinor field. The existence of the spin of matter results in the torsion field defined over spacetime. Torsion field plays the role of Bohmian quantum potential which turns out to be a kind of repulsive force as opposed to the gravitational potential which is attractive [...] Consequently, by virtue of the cosmological principle, we are led to a static universe model in which the Hubble redshifts arise from the torsion fields.
Wikipedia says that torsion fields are pseudoscientific.
> If gauge symmetry breaks in superfluids (ie. Bose-Einstein condensates); and there are superfluids at black hole thermal ranges; do gauge symmetry constraints break in [black hole] superfluids?
1. Home office. I decide when I go to co-working or to our actual office.
2. Running. I even have calendar blockers at 11am on some workdays during autumn / winter season, so that I actually see sunlight.
3. Swimming. Same as 2)
4. Walking. Same as 2) and 3), but when sick(ish), demotivated, injured. Religiously take that damn 11am-12pm slot for myself. Builds can run during that time :)
5. Daily exercises before work.
6. Daily meditation to wind down after work.
7. Bike everywhere, when weather allows. I believe that's why I'm rarely sick; not catching anything from public transportation.
8. No screens 1h before bed. Books, music, journaling. Guaranteed I'll fall asleep before 11pm :)
9. No work laptop during the weekend. Go out, shop, walk, hike, bike/swim/run more.
Well... Sometimes these plans change, sometimes I zero out on the whole list, but I know that that's fine, and temporary, later I will so much miss it that I start again.
As my friends and colleagues describe me, I'm very energetic. I'm sure my daily schedule helps to stay like that.
(YMMV, I don't own a car, I don't have kids, I'm healthy, etc.)
Eval yourselves with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and you’ll get a good idea of where to work on. It’s useful to guide an early stage security program doing all the things.
Also, build a risk matrix of security risks the company can face by impact vs likelihood of the risk happening. Get someone senior to sign off on it.
Use the NIST CSF and the risk registry with senior leadership support to guide the work you do.
Itll be easier if you think about security as understanding your risk posture as an org, and that risk is either fixed at your level, carefully escalated to outside your teams for a fix, or labeled and accepted risk. security teams should never be the ones to accept risk, so get a a manager to see and acknowledge in writing whenever it’s decided to just roll with a known vuln you’re
Unable to fix without more time/money/tech. Try to fix as many risks as possible at your level as to not build an alarmist rep. Then, that leaves space to escalate into cross-team fixes (and you can point to the NIST CSF and the risk register with a senior leader’s sit side as a baseline reason for why they need to fix it).
Have felt the same way till I used one for fastapi , One can literally implement production grade* Machine Learning pipeline in 15 lines of code using transformers in a single python file;
from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel, constr, conlist
from typing import List
from transformers import pipeline
classifier = pipeline("zero-shot-classification",
model="models/distilbert-base-uncased-mnli")
app = FastAPI()
class UserRequestIn(BaseModel):
text: constr(min_length=1)
labels: conlist(str, min_items=1)
class ScoredLabelsOut(BaseModel):
labels: List[str]
scores: List[float]
@app.post("/classification", response_model=ScoredLabelsOut)
def read_classification(user_request_in: UserRequestIn):
return classifier(user_request_in.text, user_request_in.labels)
*: Production grade if used in combination with workers, A python quirk I felt is not relevant to the topic of decorators.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/287808282/Bearden-Articles-Mind-C... ... https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C43&q=%22... ... "p sychon ergetics" .. /? Torsion fields :
- "Torsion fields generated by the quantum effects of macro-bodies" (2022) https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16245 :
> We generalize Einstein's General Relativity (GR) by assuming that all matter (including macro-objects) has quantum effects. An appropriate theory to fulfill this task is Gauge Theory Gravity (GTG) developed by the Cambridge group. GTG is a "spin-torsion" theory, according to which, gravitational effects are described by a pair of gauge fields defined over a flat Minkowski background spacetime. The matter content is completely described by the Dirac spinor field, and the quantum effects of matter are identified as the spin tensor derived from the spinor field. The existence of the spin of matter results in the torsion field defined over spacetime. Torsion field plays the role of Bohmian quantum potential which turns out to be a kind of repulsive force as opposed to the gravitational potential which is attractive [...] Consequently, by virtue of the cosmological principle, we are led to a static universe model in which the Hubble redshifts arise from the torsion fields.
Wikipedia says that torsion fields are pseudoscientific.
Retrocausality is observed.
From "Evidence of 'Negative Time' Found in Quantum Physics Experiment" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41707116 :
> "Experimental evidence that a photon can spend a negative amount of time in an atom cloud" (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03680
/?hnlog retrocausality (Ctrl-F "retrocausal", "causal") https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ )
From "Robust continuous time crystal in an electron–nuclear spin system" (2024) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39291044 ;
> [ Indefinite causal order, Admissible causal structures and correlations, Incandescent Temporal Metamaterials, ]
From "What are time crystals and why are they in kids’ toys?" https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/what-are-time-crysta... :
> Time crystals have been detected in an unexpected place: monoammonium phosphate, a compound found in fertilizer and ‘grow your own crystal’ kits.
Ammonium dihydrogen phosphate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonium_dihydrogen_phosphate :
> Piezoelectric, birefringence (double refraction), transducers
Retrocausality in photons, Retrocausality in piezoelectric time crystals which are birefringent (which cause photonic double-refraction)
Is it gauge theory, though?
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38839439 :
> If gauge symmetry breaks in superfluids (ie. Bose-Einstein condensates); and there are superfluids at black hole thermal ranges; do gauge symmetry constraints break in [black hole] superfluids?
Probably not gauge symmetry there, then.