Without being simplistic - isn't this a case of "right tool for right job"?

You can pay me to build you SAP in Excel, but you really shouldn't!

If you have a 100mb password database, should you be moving to a more scalable solution?

I think a relational DB is the best tool for the job!

I argue more for the use case of "secrets manager" than solely password manager. People store TOTP seeds and Passkeys and a myriad attachments. A SQLite store would better facilitate this, as not everything has to be in memory all the time. This is only with regard to the size constraint, there are so many other benefits to be had from a formal specification of the schema to truly future-proof the standard.

EEE

My understanding is that frame generation uses motion vectors to (slightly?) adjust the scene to produce a "highly plausible" next frame to drop in before the following "real" frame.

I've only seen videos, so from a somewhat unrealistic perspective, it seems like an acceptable compromise for low end hardware in particular.

Boosting 120hz to 240hz admittedly seems silly.

My comment isn't denigrating frame generation, which can be useful.

It's pointing out the absurdity of calling "45fps plus 1-for-1 frame generation" as if it is in any sense "90fps". It's not, and you aren't hitting a 90Hz refresh rate target at any more with it than you were without it. In point of fact, it lowers real FPS because it consumes resources that would have otherwise been available for the render pipeline.

I wish reviewers in particular would stop saying e.g. "120fps with DLSS FG enabled" and instead call out the original render rate. It makes the discourse very confusing.

120 Hz is around the point where I'd start to consider frame generation in the first place, assuming everything else in the system is optimized for minimal latency.

At 100 Hz or less, I've yet to experience frame generation in any form that doesn't result in unacceptably floaty input relative to the same system with framegen disabled.

For out 30-40% increase in infra would crucify some companies!

China has plenty of money to subside low yields while they improve their technology.

We have a great system here I believe - or at least great enough? - councils charge a percentage of the hypothetical rental value of the property in fees/taxes (in reality this hypothetical rental value is quite a bit below actual rental values - they don't seem to minmax their income).

I feel like currently, all four of those points you raised have also been significantly eroded too, and will continue to be for the following decades - countries seem to be rolling back US tech, contracts, dollars, and less people are going to the US for study.

Why does no one byok for mistral? Have they kinda "lost" the race already?

But looks great! I'm keen to actually give it a go.

I'm incredibly against AI music for various reasons, but some ongoing ambient stuff...I'll at least try it out!

It should technically work (everything is being routed via LiteLLM under the wraps) with Mistral, but it's untested haha. I don't think Mistral's lost the race; it's just that it doesn't seem to be that popular relative to Gemini/Anthropic/OpenAI, so I didn't bother testing it.

Hope you got a chance to try this out!

Despite likely to be labelled 'right wing'...isn't a governments first responsibility to its citizens?

I'd understand carve outs for foreign workers, etc...but if you're a foreign WORKer, you'd hope that the work could pay for housing?

Social housing is typically a safety net for those fallen on hard times, or people with various handicaps and unable to work?

China is absolutely crushing everyone mostly across the board in technology these days. It's comical today, but will just be embarrassing soon.

The only bit visually we see China a little behind is AI but I suspect they have much better closed/unreleased models, and the fab/chip space, but they'll close that gap in a short few years I'd expect.