I tried something that I asked chatGPT 4 and it failed. It tells me to look at the console for errors. What I did was copy and paste the text output from BeautifulSoup of a website and ask it write a python code that cleans this so it's easier for a machine learning model to handle.
EDIT 1: I then simplify the question and set it to expert mode. I ask
```
given some text after it was scraped by beautiful soup.
write a python code that cleans this so it's easier for a machine learning model to handle
```.
I then copy and paste the output into the additional context section.
The code it gave me was how to use beautiful soup and to remove unnecessary white spaces. ChatGPT gave a more thorough answer which is to use some regex to clean the text.
EDIT 2: Got it to work better by setting it to expert mode and copy pasting the whole thing. It truncates a lot of the text and missed the question at the bottom. Then, after it gives some generic answer. I asked the question on using python to cleans this so it's easier for a machine learning model to handle. It gave me a much better answer and with the links on where it got it from.
Very cool tech. I'll be trying it a lot. Thank you.
i'm a shopify partner and i agree with this sentiment. changing the cli is one thing, but making it require a full app restructure is so risky that i'm holding off on doing it until the very last minute. besides, it looks like they are pushing more towards embedded apps. that is fine, but you need to also cater to app developers with standalone applications.
finally, i do think it will change again because the structure for theme app extensions have changed and now i'm not even sure if my project will work if i update that section.
the migration documents are very bad and they remove old documents. for example, it used to be that you need to add a folder called `theme-app-extensions` and it's very different, and there is no migration docs for that. they just want you to use cli 3 out of the blue.
I like this development. I went to GT for both bachelors and Masters but with BME and ECE, respectively. However, I am doing web development at a startup. I wonder how this OMS course would impact me and others in similar situations.
Wow! Very interesting stuff but every time I see something interesting, I have more questions than answers. For example, what happens to the fluid in your body? If it floats around, won't we die???
Which fluids are you talking about specifically? I've very little knowledge of anatomy but I think most of the liquids in our body are in "closed-loop" pressurised systems, with nowhere for the fluid to "go" whilst being forced in to motion by our muscles.
I came from a electrical and computer engineering background and so I am more used to procedural programming. When I started with iOS development, I tried IB but then I cannot figure out the magic and decided to create my UI mostly from code. Then, I started doing more and more software and adding more code, and managing it becomes painful. Since this is a personal project, I do not want to spend too much time and want to follow Apple's way of doing things. Since then, I started using XIB file and adding them slowly. It is important to realize that it is NOT an all or nothing approach. You can mix and match XIB and code with what you are comfortable with.
Some comments say that using UI will eventually restrict you. That might be true and I can totally see that. However, at that time, it is a good idea to step back and look at the overall design and figure out if you over design something. I like functional apps that work with little effort. It does not mean that it have to look ugly but you can customize and beautify the UI within the constraints of Apple's framework. Yes, there will be limits but is it worth the extra complexity of rolling it out on your own?
I have not tried storyboard but I would like to try it out soon.
In general, my philosophy has changed to use good, solid, reliable frameworks and keep the design (UI) and features (code) simpler. You will be able to get 90% of what you really want with less work (coding and maintaining).
Thanks @Shank. So basically, he is saying be less geeky? Btw, not trolling because I like technology but haven't watched star trek series or even the first star wars.
Well, what I am doing right now, just trying out so can't say for sure how effective it is. I was working with a a freelancer who knows python and is more experienced than me so I say I'll pay for your time for pair programming, design review, etc...
What I would do is to code the way I would and then go over it with him via teamviewer or something and we chat over skype. For me, the difficult part is creating the right classes and refactoring, making unit tests and making code scale. I also have design questions. Perhaps I'll make a post when I have more feedback.
Great idea and looks cool but I typed in my address and I know a pretty big church next to my house was not on the list. If you want to look into it, it's called victory world church in norcross.
While we have a huge amount of information regarding churches across the US, only churches that actively manage their profiles are listed in the search results. We've found this results in more useful information for someone looking for a church and provides a better overall look-and-feel.
EDIT 1: I then simplify the question and set it to expert mode. I ask ``` given some text after it was scraped by beautiful soup. write a python code that cleans this so it's easier for a machine learning model to handle ```.
I then copy and paste the output into the additional context section.
The code it gave me was how to use beautiful soup and to remove unnecessary white spaces. ChatGPT gave a more thorough answer which is to use some regex to clean the text.
EDIT 2: Got it to work better by setting it to expert mode and copy pasting the whole thing. It truncates a lot of the text and missed the question at the bottom. Then, after it gives some generic answer. I asked the question on using python to cleans this so it's easier for a machine learning model to handle. It gave me a much better answer and with the links on where it got it from.
Very cool tech. I'll be trying it a lot. Thank you.