For a 20% return in a year?

The numbers given have to be incorrect.

Oh yeah I wasn't taking OPs number at face value

probably 2%, not 20%.

As an employee, too.

Then you can’t make it targeted.

True.

Interesting take considering graphql adoption is growing and generally in favor at my company.

Is this VM somehow related to Lynx (their cross platform dev tooling?)

https://lynxjs.org/

Also discussed on HN

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43264957

From the article:

> Rocha explained that KOBO’s bone marrow is actually “full of oil,” even though the whale has been dead for more than two decades.

> “It’s seeping out through the pores of the bones,” Rocha said. “The outer edges of the bone are a little more porous than human bones and [gravity is] just pulling the oil out.”

I think you just fell into the trap.

If the panels are 20% more efficient, wouldn't you need to install 20% less of them?

As an aside to the topic, that's not quite how the maths would work. If the panels were 100% more efficient, you wouldn't need 100% less of them

If the panels were 20% more efficient, you'd want 1 -1/1.20 = 16.7% less of them.

Yes, but that only becomes a win if the new panels cost less than 20% more than existing ones.

If they cost less than 20% more _total_, including installation costs, which is interesting because it means the higher the installation costs in a particular area the more likely it is to be worth the added cost of the more efficient panels (which presumably aren't more difficult to install than traditional panels).

Because you don’t want to share germs with other users of the browser? The logic makes no sense and I honestly can’t tell if you’re joking.

People on this website often have difficulty detecting sarcasm, you're not alone.