Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | WA's commentslogin

And they don’t reason. They do prompt smoothing.

Nationalism is on the rise in most EU countries and they get away with saying all kinds of things you apparently dream about, but feel censored to say. The tale of lacking free speech is a lie.

Free speech in the EU is different from the US. Insulting people is not considered free speech in the EU. Calling "fire" in a packed cinema wrongly is not covered by free speech in the EU.

You can say a lot of things, but you might feel social pressure, which is a feature, not a bug.


Apple could've made Lightning open and maybe Lightning would've been the new USB-C, if it is the superior product. But no, they chose not to.

This is the future of the internet. More and more countries have their local laws and international companies need to comply with local laws. This has been the case forever for companies selling products and (physical) services and some digital services restricting music and movie rights in certain countries, but it will expand to more and more services and apps in the future.

"Local laws" is quite the loaded term when your parent commenter's anecdote is about EU which currently encompasses 27 countries.

And when "comply with local laws" means "unbrick bluetooth pairing for third-party devices" then a company in good faith could just, you know, not brick the functionality in the first place. There's no law against products that "just work".


Good. It was hubris to think that the internet would forever be segregated as an American asset.

> It doesn’t use the public WhatsApp API, it reimplements the official WhatsApp client auth.

Nothing wrong with that if the official API has less features.

> Authentication uses a shared secret and it’s obvious that you as a third party obtaining this secret from your users

What do you mean? Usually, you install such a package to automate WhatsApp for your own account.


Good article! A few thoughts popped into my head while reading:

- My favorite deployment is rsync over SSH and occasionally, I still upload a file over SFTP.

- MongoDB will always AWALYS be in my mind as the buggy database that bought itself into dev minds with lots of money but ultimately was all hype and risky to use from a business perspective. Turns out, especially with the rise of TypeScript that most data has a solid structure anyways and while NoSQL has its places, most projects benefit from good old SQL.

- Slack launched in 2013? Man, time flies.

- I still hardly use Docker and just deploy straight to a VPS running Debian.

- I remember the first years of TypeScript, which were kinda tough. Many projects had no types. I sometimes considered to use one package over another just because they had proper types.

- VSCode is a good thing and if you don't go too crazy with plugins, it works stable and performant. I like it.

- Next.js gives me MongoDB vibes. An over-engineered, way too "magical" framework that hijacked developer minds and is built on the weird assumption that React, a DOM manipulation library, belongs on the server. I never got the appeal and I will just wait this out. Meanwhile, I'm having fun with Hono. Easy to build API-based backends as well as MPAs with server-side HTML generation, runs on Node, Bun, Deno and whatnot, feels lightweight and accessible and gives me a lot of control.


I use Docker a lot myself... even outside Kubernetes, I just find it easier to work with Compose for semi-complex apps, dev environment or production.

I think VS Code is probably more responsible for TypeScript acceptance than any other project. Just having good interactions with the editor I think brought a lot of the requests to add type definitions to projects.

I'm with you on Next/Mongo... while as a Dev I liked a lot about Mongo, I'd never want to admin it again, I'm fine with PostgreSQL's JSONB for when I need similar features. On Next specifically, usually avoid it... fatter clients aren't so bad IMO.

Edit: +1 for Hono too... Beyond that, Deno has become my main scripting environment for all my scripting needs.


I love Docker. So many problems solved at once. Deployments to slightly different server environments were one of my banes of existence.

(Order is randomized by HN, sorry if that makes this a Where's Waldo task)


We just live longer than back then and have way more opportunities to see these (mostly) late-life diseases. Same with cancer.

Yes, average life span was shorter back then because of child mortality. But the vast majority of surviving adults never reached age 80. Old age was 60-70 and many of these diseases only occur at 70+ in significant numbers.


Autism diagnosis has targeted screening questionnaires. So what kind of general purpose screening do you mean?


Get screened for whatever you think you've got. Think you've got ADHD? Go get an ADHD screening. Autism? It's not easy to find a psych who does adult Autism screenings, but they're out there. OCD? You get the idea.

Regardless of whether the conclusion is "yes you have x" or "no you don't have x" the diagnosis will be accompanied by a detailed analysis of your psychological condition. Whether or not you are diagnosed, that analysis will cover the issues that led you to believe you may have that condition.


> It's not easy to find a psych who does adult Autism screenings, but they're out there

And it’s very expensive to get the diagnosis, it can be up to $20k in California


I paid $150 on crap startup insurance.


And then what?

Nobody will accommodates you.

Suing for ADA violations will cost $20k just for a retainer. And then it's a gamble if you win or not.

And the US government wants to aggregate us into a list for who knows what reason.


In lieu of repeating myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46178777

Mental health, like physical health, requires action on your part. If the only thing you're seeking from a diagnosis is accommodations from others, then yeah, you're probably going to be disappointed.


I think you mean the full diagnostic process? Screening is just the first step in (what should be) a long process to decide whether the full workup makes sense. Screening takes on the order of minutes to an hour and it doesn't come with a diagnosis, the actual diagnostic process should take many hours and several appointments.


This approach might help some, but it might hinder too.

There is a post here about someone who was misdiagnosed and bipolar and that later came up when security clearance was needed for a job.


I'm getting a full neuro-psych screening next month because my therapist suspects I may have OCD. It's a 4-6 hour series of tests/interviews (and probably other stuff, I'll find out). I'm guessing that's what they're referring to?


You need:

- table of contents

- automatic chapter and section numbering

- cross references and automatic tracking of figures, tables etc.

- different styles besides blockquotes such as info sections, warnings, tips

Imho, cross-referencing chapters, pages, figures, tables and the lack thereof in Markdown is the first and most important thing to check how you would like this to be solved.


Pandoc and pandoc-crossref. Or simply use quarto.


Thanks!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: