The reason we have so few RAM manufacturers in the first place is that was (until just a few months ago) an extremely low margin business.
New production capacity takes years to bring online, and manufacturers are rightly cautious of the current demand bubble bursting, leaving them billions of dollars out of pocket.
While not ideal, it’s better than the usual situation with new RFCs etc, where no implementation actually exists, and the specification is unusable for the purpose of properly defining how an implementation should actually work.
It's less about "opening it up" and more about the tanker companies feeling there is enough safety. With the Red Sea instance, they didn't start running ships until the Houthis said they were done.
The feeling of safety in this scenario would be provided by the assurance that anyone who tries picking on a tanker would be stomped into the ground by a destroyer.
Google found, on their 100,000+ machine Linux desktop fleet that sticking with “stable” releases and doing major upgrades periodically was far more work than rolling releases.
I would genuinely enjoy Windows (with WSL) if Microsoft didn’t go to special efforts to make the experience horrible by shoving useless AI functionality, or advertising down my throat.
This explains why China's defense capabilities are outpacing the west in 2026. The defense behemoth who castrates users by denying them the all-powerful TrackPoint will be doomed to irrelevance very soon.
New production capacity takes years to bring online, and manufacturers are rightly cautious of the current demand bubble bursting, leaving them billions of dollars out of pocket.
reply