Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bobbiechen's commentslogin

> your bank (hopefully) doesn't check with some central database the government controls before issuing you an account.

Hmm... the OFAC SDN and other sanctions lists? Politically exposed persons lists? These are very standard KYC/AML checks.


What about when obtaining a SIM card or internet access? What about when purchasing a bus or train or plane ticket? Do you think you should have to identify yourself with a digital ID to withdraw your own money from your own bank account? Your average citizen isn't on a sanction list or a politically exposed persons list. In a national digital ID system they will be on a list regardless of whether or not they've done anything wrong, and the government can easily block their access if they don't like what they've been doing. Governments should not have this kind of control over the lives of ordinary citizens.

Not to mention the fact that NGOs like the World Bank and the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation are funding this. It's proof that it's more than just nation states that want to implement these digital ID systems. Why should the world bank or Bill Gates have any influence on who can and cannot withdraw their own money?


>I’m going to tell you about how I took a job building software to kill people.

>But don’t get distracted by that; I didn’t know at the time.

Caleb Hearth: "Don't Get Distracted" https://calebhearth.com/dont-get-distracted


But he did know he was going to work for the military.

"I’d be joining a contracting company for the Department of Defense."

(But interesting article otherwise)


Yeah but this itself doesn't necessarily have to mean anything, e.g. DARPA sponsored half of the nice things we're using every day.

"DARPA sponsored half of the nice things we're using every day"

That's a very bold claim. (And I am aware of the history of the Internet)


"Half" is obviously an exaggeration but apart from time-sharing operating systems, the Internet, what is now CSAIL and (partially) GPS, they sponsored a ton of open source projects. They used to maintain a catalog[0]. The Web Archive version[1] contains a partial list (e.g. OpenBSD was sponsored only for a few years and is not included there).

[0] https://www.darpa.mil/opencatalog

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20140301185004/https://www.darpa...


The bigger issue with your perspective is that you do not realize that the underlying purpose of the things you do not attribute to the military or equate as bad, is still groundwork or “capacity building” deliberately for militaristic purposes and objectives, usually very intentionally so that you don’t realize it. You would likely not support things if you were overly told what the underlying objective was.

Let me put it this way, if you wanted a populace that will willingly enter the military to serve your purposes of world domination through constant warfare, would you promote TV and movies, rather than reading classical literature and philosophy; and fund and press movie houses to make films that put joining the military to go to war and templating being a “warrior” as a positive thing instead of a negative, murderous thing?


I don't have any perspective, just state a fact - DARPA did contribute to things we find useful.

The core issue itself is terribly complex because in an ideal world we would never need military at all, and at least in Europe we had this hope that humanity is evolving in this direction, and that eventually even the wars in the Middle East and Africa will calm down. 2014 and 2022 were rude awakenings - there are crazy people out there, and they became nation leaders, and will start a war for one reason or another. That's why I don't have a unified opinion on that, especially that some military tech like interceptors are saving people's lives.


To be fair, the name of that Department used to be very confusing...

The name of that Department was chosen to be aspirational, to encourage it to try to keep within its Constitutional guardrails, to keep it focused on the right mission.

Sure, it often didn't live up to its aspirations and a lot of the fence posts of those Constitutional guardrails got moved, but wearing those aspirations on its sleeve left some room for people to challenge it and openly criticize it by reminding the Department of its guardrails and its mission.

The name change is disrespectful to the Constitution, if not terrifying for other reasons.


Not sure if it's top 3, but I use Monica https://www.monicahq.com/ which does advertise itself as a personal CRM. I certainly underutilize its features but things like birthday reminders + a place for a few notes (where do they live again? who's their partner?) is nice

You can also self-host Monica, either via Docker or on metal if you're comfortable with Laravel.

I just put that stuff into obsidian here. Only thing I miss are the birthday reminders but there's probably a plugin for that :)

oh interesting, I never thought about using my obsidian vault for that.

Can you share a bit more about how you structure this and how you would recommend getting started ?


Well I just have a folder in obsidian and a template for friends. So I can fill in the various fields like address, names of kids/pets, things they like for when I need to buy a present etc.

The rest I just freeform.

But reminders would be nice.


I recommend keeping it simple. The Obsidian "Bases" feature is a good fit for this if you don't want to go deep w plugins and DIY (which is also viable but has more learning curve and overhead).

Being first matters :')

I wrote a font for these, which does use the triangle-5 and the vertical layout: https://bobbiec.github.io/cistercian-font.html (recent discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46939312)

And my associated writeup: https://digitalseams.com/blog/making-a-font-with-9999-ligatu... .

As mentioned in the blog, I think the horizontal layout makes more sense too (in terms of writing order). But just like the triangle-5, the vertical layout is more commonly seen, so that's what I stuck with.


I like this a lot. I've seen similar categorization demos on things like Hacker News submissions, but categorizing random links from random people is much less useful than finding the relevant functionality from a codebase (that presumably does a thing as opposed to being a collection of random code)


Speed is a courtesy, sure. I think polish for the sake of polish is bad, and the AI powered polishing is worse. See also: https://x.com/ClickHole/status/2020915972979425699


(creator here) +1, the different digits add trivially as you say.

I also thought it was fun that when you overlay digits, you do get 1+4=5, 1+6=7, 1+8=9, 2+6=8, and 2+7=9 . That one I only found accidentally after a bit of playing, so the demo note is more of a fun side note than a really useful property.


Neat demo. I work in this space of bot detection and unfortunately it is trivial to write scripts (or prompt AIs) to insert human-like keystroke and mouse movements. I did so in this demo with about 5 seconds of Cursor use (around 4:25): https://stytch.com/blog/combating-ai-threats-stytchs-device-...

At the same time, I'm sure this still helps against drive-by attackers. For more motivated attackers, it's one more hoop for them to jump through, though you'd want to do some hardening on the client-side script since it's easy to manipulate the Javascript environment.

Edit: I ended up testing it, not bad! The basic script got to about 0.45 in the end, but never was confidently marked as human. With the hint of the 5 metrics in the prompt, a more advanced script did get to 0.63 (human and confident), but that needed the insider information.


Important too, a fully loaded salary costs the company far more than the actual salary that the employee receives. That would tip this balancing point towards 120k salaries, which is well into the realm of non-FAANG


As the joke goes,

Do you think [big tech company] understands consent?

> Yes

> Ask me later


Related to this, does anyone here know how to stop my iPhone asking me to turn on iCloud?


Buy a different phone?


Yeah I probably will, when this one breaks. I had Android always before and I'm pretty unimpressed with Apple. HN'ers love to imagine that only Apple has their interests in mind unlike other BigCos, but no Android phone I had ever nudged me out of the blue, in the middle of other work, to "turn on Google Drive" with just "Ok" and "Ask me later" as the options.


I’ve used iPhones exclusively as my daily driver phone for almost 20 years now.

It’s tempting to get a phone that GrapheneOS supports at my next refresh.

I generally like Apple’s technology. I like their high level stability - they don’t launch things as experiments in the same way other technology companies do. They seem to make a serious effort at only launching things they plan to keep around and refine. I think that’s the only user-friendly way to do it.

But I’m concerned about the post-Cook era particularly because in recent years the hardware has gotten better but the software has gotten worse. It is starting to feel like Apple is unable, unwilling, or incapable of focusing on two sides of the coin at once.

The software side is more data hungry than ever, no matter what they do with that data. They are seemingly desperate for services revenue on top of premium prices for devices. It was insane that any release, let alone how many releases, automatically enabled or re-enabled (after prior user disablement) Apple Intelligence. They finally stopped disrespecting asserted user choices but it took them awhile. That in particular really soured me. They had already learned that lesson (for some reason they had to learn that lesson period) with automatic OS update settings.

I’ve been working for a few years now on extricating myself from the connected services sides of both Microsoft and Apple so that it will be far easier to make the leap to GrapheneOS (or an analogue) when and if I decide to.


I have an android phone and it hates me almost as much as apple, but it has better hardware for a lower price, and I can technically use f–droid


On Android, it is really easy to turn notifications off by default, and only selectively allow the ones you need, e.g. from the calendar.


Oh yeah, it's super easy to turn off notifications from any app except the built–in adware.


Until recently (moved to GrapheneOS) I ran stock Android for years and never had an issue with turning any notifications from default apps. Maybe this is different with other manufactures and custom OS version (e.g., Samsung's)? I think the only thing that bugged me was Google Play pushing new features/ways to give them money, but that was only within the app itself when I opened it. Notifications of that sort were all easily blocked. The only notifications I got and get are ones I want (99% of it are messages from messaging apps, calendar reminders, and alarms).


My Motorola phone gives me a notification asking me to rate the audio quality after every single call. I can't turn off those notifications without rooting the phone. All I can do is uninstall updates to the phone app and disable automatic updates for that app, so at least they won't add more notification spam and can't keep rearranging the UI of the most important app on the phone.


Eh, I get AI enablement pop-ups all the time on android


Hah, thanks for the heads-up.


> Yes

> I am sinful and will go to hell


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: