I guessed this was coming after you couldn't cast to a device that was logged into a different account. Would be a nice experience to be able to cast Paw patrol from one of the kids accounts instead of cluttering the in-laws view history with kids shows.
I had a lanboy? case that came with a carry strap. The case was also mostly aluminum so it was pretty light. Not many people had laptops back then. Managers at work maybe had one. Most people had a proper desktop.
This does not appear to be support by SOAP or WCF. From the SOAP specification:
"Bindings MAY provide for streaming when processing messages. That is, SOAP nodes MAY begin processing a received SOAP message as soon as the necessary information is available. SOAP processing is specified in terms of SOAP message infosets (see 5. SOAP Message Construct). Although streaming SOAP receivers will acquire such XML infosets incrementally, SOAP processing MUST yield results identical to those that would have been achieved if the entire SOAP envelope were available prior to the start of processing. For example, as provided in 2.6 Processing SOAP Messages, identification of targeted SOAP header blocks, and checking of all mustUnderstand attributes is to be done before successful processing can proceed. Depending on the representation used for the XML infoset, and the order in which it is transmitted, this rule might limit the degree to which streaming can be achieved."
The critical note is the output for streamed, or buffered must the the same so it does not look like infinite streams can be supported.
I also played with your sample application to see if there was any indication of the connection dropping.
I had an interesting result switching to the NetTcp binding. On the client it is unable to exit until the max size of the incoming message is hit. The server continues running as there are no sent message quotas.
This worked for me as well. I just asked the eye doctor for something that would work just past my out stretched finger tips which is where my monitor lives.
What kills me is going into the office where I am switching between glasses. Different rooms with different Zoom screens. At home is much nicer where I just have one big monitor to watch.
I take my glasses off to read my phone most of the time. Technically my primary glasses are progressives but it is nicer to take them off.
> I take my glasses off to read my phone most of the time. Technically my primary glasses are progressives but it is nicer to take them off.
Same. I wear progressive lenses and I feel like they do fine as far as being able to read the text on my phone or for reading a book. But I tend to take off my glasses anyway to do these things. I'm not entirely sure why this is since I seem to be able to read the text fine with the glasses. My hypothesis is that I like being closer to the text so that it fills up more of my visual field which helps me mentally focus on the text better.
reply