Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dmitrygr's commentslogin

"We chose to base our System-on-Module (SOM) "

Holy clickbait, batman! The hard parts were done for them! All the fast signals like DDR are on the SoM, designed by real humans who understand EE. To make it all even more of a lie, their design is basically a copy of the reference base-board for the SoM.

"Boots on first attempt" well, duh! the SoM is self-contained. It boots all by itself as is... so no wonder that it boots.

No EMC results either. Making things work is 10% of the work. Passing certs on unintended emissions and making it stable is the other 150%.


My reading of this is that they asked the system to redesign the PCB that was used in the i.MX 8M reference system-on-module. It looks like they take a parts list, a PCB shape, and a rough floorplan and pass that to their tool, which spits out a PCB design.

https://www.quilter.ai/blog/preparing-an-ai-designed-compute...

I could actually see myself using this tool, as someone who trained as an EE and still likes to tinker with electronics. It would be fun to just assemble a parts list and a rough layout and then receive a working electronic device a few weeks later with minimal work.


They designed both SOC and IO boards.

This was always the end game and all our warnings were ignored. One of those very bittersweet “told you so” moments. Bye bye, Britain.

  > We need a healthly ecosystem where there are hundreds of separate companies each solving 1-5 use cases.
please make a successful economic case for a company only making a mobile phone OS, in a world where android exists and china can crank out 100x the devices at 1/10 the price paying $0 per device license fees than eu could.

The way I read the US constitution, every federal government agency is necessarily contained in one of the three branches, since the entire federal government is made of and only of those three branches. FCC is not in the legislative branch -- constitution is clear that that is only the congress, it is not judicial -- the constitution is clear that those are the courts. So it is in the executive, which makes sense since its job is to enforce law -- the job of the executive branch. The executive branch reports directly to and is directly answerable to the head of the executive -- the president.

The congress cannot legislate a fourth branch even if they wanted to. They'd need a constitutional amendment for that. We have thus, by a simple application of reading and logic concluded that this is precisely as is expected given the US constitution.


it never was...

I worked on SW at apple. I would be VERY surprised, to a point where i'll offer you a $1k USD bet.

At least one (and I assume all) manufacturers of network hardware have backroom code sharing deals with the NSA, and likely only highest leadership and a single release engineer knows about it.

I personally know a trustworthy release engineer that described in detail they were the person that had to send all new source code for each release to an NSA owned FTP server.

Does that mean Apple is actually doing this too? Hard to say, but when there is no accountability it is best to operate under the assumption the worst is happening. Particularly given Tim Cook is very publicly sucking up to the president every chance he gets.


I met the people. None of them would stand for that. My bet offer remains

Im presuming you can't just directly ask the people you met if this mysterious modded Airtag exists?

Also on a side note: Did anything happen in 2025 regarding the saga from Defcon last year or did everyone just move on after 24? I apologize if this is still a sore issue.


I hear you, and if I was given such an order, even if it came with a gag order, I would never comply and would go straight to the press, consequences be damned.

Problem is everyone knows the people like me that would react this way, and those people go on vacation eventually or can be replaced. Pay attention when that happens.

If Trump asked Tim Cook for a favor, I bet it gets taken care of one way or the other.

I would not take your bet on any specific company at any specific time, but in the scale of the top ten tech companies over a decade, it is absolutely happening regularly with some of them and there is political will for it to be all of them.


> Regen braking isn't more complicated than an alternator.

Either disingenuous or ill-informed. one is ~1KW for a few seconds a day, the other is > 100KW of power for dozens of seconds, multiple dozens of times a day. completely engineering


  > capital owners successfully avoid contributing to the financing of our states and social system
Say what now? So i've been paying cap gains tax like a chump while there is a "no thanks" option you're aware of? Please tell me where to tick that box.

"computers used to require"

please do not write code. ever. Thinking like this is why people now think that 16GB RAM is to little and 4 cores is the minimum.

API -> ~200,000 cycles to get data, RAM O(size of data), precise result

HTML -> LLM -> ~30,000,000,000 cycles to get data, RAM O(size of LLM weights), results partially random and unpredictable


If API doesn’t have the data you want, this point is moot.

Not GP, but I disagree. I've written successful, robust web scrapers without LLMs for decades.

What do you think the E in perl stands for?


This is probably just a parallel discussion. I written plenty of successful web scrapers without LLM's, but in the last couple years, I've written a lot more where I didn't need to look at the web markup for more than a few seconds first, if at all. Often you can just copy-paste an example page into the LLM and have it generate accurate, consistent selectors. It's not much different when integrating with a formal API, except that the API usually has more explicit usage rules, and APIs will also often restrict data that can very obviously be used competitively.

Double-posting so I'm sorry but the more I read this the less it makes sense. The parent reply was talking about data that was straight-up not available via the API, how does perl help with that?

Yeah, I don’t get it either. Someone trying AI to mass reply?

Maybe Perl is more powerful than I've ever given it credit for.

On the other hand, I already have an HTML parser, and your bespoke API would require a custom tool to access.

Multiply that by every site, and that approach does not scale. Parsing HTML scales.


You already have a JSON and XML parser too, and the website offers standardised APIs in both of those

Not standardized enough; I can't guarantee the format of an API is RESTful, I can't know apriori what the response format is (arbitrary servers on the internet can't be trusted to be setting content type headers properly) or How to crawl it given the response data, etc. we ultimately never solved the problem of universal self- describing APIs, so a general crawling service can't trust they work.

In contrast, I can always trust that whatever is returned to be consumed by the browser is in the format that is consumable by a browser, because if it isn't the site isn't a website. Html is pretty much the only format guaranteed to be working.


parsing html -> lazy but ok

using an llm to parse html -> please do not


> Lazy but ok

You're absolutely welcome on your own free time to waste it on whatever feels right

> using an llm to parse html -> please do not

have you used any of these tools with a beginner's mindset in like, five years?


A lot of software engineering is recognizing the limitations of the domain that you're trying to work in, and adapting your tools to that environment, but thank you for your contribution to the discussion.

EDIT: I hemmed and hawed about responding to your attitude directly, but do you talk to people anywhere but here? Is this the attitude you would bring to normal people in your life?

Dick Van Dyke is 100 years old today. Do you think the embittered and embarrassing way you talk to strangers on the internet is positioning your health to enable you to live that long, or do you think the positive energy he brings to life has an effect? Will you readily die to support your animosity?


Weeping and gnashing of teeth because RAM is expensive, and then you learn that people buy 128 GB for their desktops so they can ask a chatbot how to scrape HTML. Amazing.

The more I've thought about it the RAM part is hardly the craziest bit. Where the fuck do you even buy a computer with less than 4 cores in 2025? Pawn shop?

isn't it ridiculous? This is hacker news. Nobody with the spare time to post here is living on the street. Buy some RAM or rent it. I can't believe honestly how many people on here I see bemoaning the fact that they haven't upgraded their laptops in 20 years and it's somehow anyone else's problem.

I may be out of the loop; is system RAM key for LLMs? I thought they were mostly graphics RAM constrained.

it's kind of hard to tell what your position is here. should people not ask chatbots how to scrape html? should people not purchase RAM to run chatbots locally?

> why not use another operating system?

on pc hardware, no alternatives exist that support sleep/wake properly while also providing for good battery life on modern hardware


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: