Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Calling your guide the ‘ultimate guide’ is disingenuous marketing. No single guide can cover all security concepts in all contexts. Every time I see that sorta wording I just assume the writer doesn’t actually know what they’re talking about


Continued: and given the writer seems to be all about tools the article fails to highlight that static (and automated dynamic) tools are limited in their ability to detect some classes of vulnerabilities and need to be backed with experience manual testing. This almost feels like it’s been written by a devops engineer who has a vague understanding about containerisation doesn’t have a clue about real and practical mechanisms to secure applications and services hosted inside containers.

I’m not saying the article is totally bad, but calling it an ‘Ultimate Guide’ makes the author a charlatan.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: