> You in fact are, but those things aren't as severe as a tattoo on your face declaring your widely-recognized status as someone's property.
How often did this happen and what evidence is there to support it’s widespread usage?
I suggest you do some research and find out to your satisfaction. For a comment thread, I've already provided a reasonable amount.
> You in fact are, but those things aren't as severe as a tattoo on your face declaring your widely-recognized status as someone's property.
How often did this happen and what evidence is there to support it’s widespread usage?