Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Shutting down the entire CN rail network apparently didn't qualify previously.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/marc-miller-path-forward-pr...

These railway blockades forced layoffs, and the CBC also notes that rail carries three times more than what trucks do in Canada.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/rail-shutdown-pro...

Instead, in this case, the Trudeau government met with the protestors and had a process of dialogue that resolved them peacefully after almost a year.



There are a couple of rather large exaggerations in your post.

It wasn't the "entire CN rail network" (instead it was the Eastern Canada segment, comprising maybe 15% of CN's network). They don't claim that rail carries three times more than trucks do, but instead simply note that one rail car carries as much as three trucks.

And the blockade lasted approximately 2-3 weeks. Not sure what you mean by "after almost a year".

But let's be clear -- most of Canada was enraged about that. It was hugely expensive to Trudeau politically, and was a tenterhooks [edit - thank you fennec] situation because of the aboriginal file. Yet most of Canada absolutely wanted a stronger response and it hurt Trudeau in the election.

I honestly don't get these "but the rail blockade" or "but some BLM protest in some US city" responses.


>It was hugely expensive to Trudeau politically, and was a tenterhooks [edit - thank you fennec] situation because of the aboriginal file. Yet most of Canada absolutely wanted a stronger response and it hurt Trudeau in the election.

So as long as it's politically expedient for the sitting PM you would advocate using the emergencies act? Yikes.


> So as long as it's politically expedient for the sitting PM you would advocate using the emergencies act? Yikes.

Can you point to the part of my post that said that? Anywhere?

Yikes.

Stronger response simply means demanding that police enforce existing laws and injunctions (where injunctions are often simply court orders saying "follow the law") instead of the conciliatory let-it-play-out messaging that Trudeau used at the time. Even in the case of the current protests the emergency act seems unnecessary, and is basically a failure condition for the Ottawa Police basically doing nothing and claiming that they're all out of ideas.


> I honestly don't get these... "but some BLM protest in some US city" responses

I am ok with BLM blocking infrastructure and disripting things to spread an important message. But we have to give everybody the same ability then.



> I honestly don't get these "but the rail blockade" or "but some BLM protest in some US city" responses.

It's usually called integrity and honestty




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: