To be fair, we are talking about Twitter here.

Even if it improves the performance of the company? What's more important, to have things orderly, or performant?

what's also scary is that he could do this with pretty much every public company he wants (very few exceptions of companies with >200B market cap or so).

I suspect he doesn't have that much liquidity. Twitter is number 484 by market cap.

>totally unacceptable

Who decides?

> his decorum is totally unacceptable

Because Twitter's decorum's track record is better? You must have missed an episode or two.

Twitter decorum