Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hmm, I might suggest reading/watching Andromeda Strain to see how well "clean room" reacts to unkown foreign substance. How much plastic is used in proposed clean room that the bacteria will feast on to weaken the "well laid plans" of the clean room's designers before escaping into the wild?


Re-read my comment

> Something more like medical grade maggots that are engineered to never reproduce would suffice.

We do this sort of thing already quite a bit.

You could also make them unable to survive without some kind of cheap chemical liquid to suspend them in.

As far as I know, it's actually a bit difficult to make new organisms that survive outside a petri dish and can spread like an unstoppable plague.


And the dinosaurs in Jurasic Park were engineered to be only females.

I don't trust humans manipulating organisms at this level. We're too new at it, but I understand that you have to try things out. We all do it with code when we're learning a new language/framework/etc. However, we've all had code that was only intended to be a PoC that then gets released into production without being fully tested. That's when the issues are found. Some lab wants to monetize the thing they've spent years researching but not fully understood/tested and then we're all some scifi plot.


Jurassic Park wasn’t real.


That was one of the major points of the novel (IMHO).

"What if ..." Something that Science Fiction is best at.

"Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn't Stop To Think If They Should." -- Ian Malcom (Jurassic Park)

Leaded additives to gasoline came to mind as one problem that needed to be halted sooner.


Leaded gasoline was NOT a scientific invention. Leaded gasoline was chosen by the bean counters because it was cheaper.


....and Jurasic Park was a fictional work, just like Andromeda Strain?


By the same author, at that.


>reading/watching Andromeda Strain to see how well

But this is a fictional story, why would one use this to inform their perspective on anything?


Not all fiction is pure fantasy. Sometimes, the fictional work is from someone very smart and researched on a topic that comes up with a story that not only entertains but provokes a larger discussion on the topic. For example, Tom Clancy wrote about using an airplane as a kinetic weapon. Clancy was known for being very well researched on the topics he discussed. Too bad his plot device wasn't given more attention in the real world or the beginning decades of the 21st century might have turned out differently. From my understanding Crichton was known to have researched his topics as well.

Humanity ignore the thought discussions that ficitional work provokes at humanity's peril.


Why would you ever make a gorilla cage out of bananas?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: