Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

AIM-9X (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-9_Sidewinder#AIM-9X) has 90 degree off-boresight capabilities with helmet mounted displays, being able to pull 60Gs.

So not quite "backwards", but dang close. With that being said, beyond visual range (BVR) engagements for gen 4 and higher fighters (gen 4 would be F-16 (the best plane ever produced, and everyone here knows it ;), F-18, MiG-29, Su-27; gen 5 would be F-22, F-35... and somewhat arguably Su-57) should be the norm. The USAF/US Navy is a bit behind on this with the AIM-120C/D being a medium-range missile where as some of the Russian-produced missiles have a longer reach. The USAF currently has a program to produce a long-range variant of the AIM-120C/D (our last long range missile was the AIM-54 Phoenix, exclusively carried by the retired F-14) with the designation of AIM-260 -- the AIM-260 is expected to replace the AIM-120.

AIM-120C/D "maddog" call -- now that'd be an interesting air-to-air engagement -- "maddog" is the call for firing the AIM-120 without the aircraft having radar lock and whatever the missile picks up on it's terminal guidance radar is likely doomed.

Ahhh I played way too much Falcon 4.0 and the DCS F-16 module.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: