The sentiment is that JS coercion is so bad that explicit coercion programming behaviors, linters, Typescript, and adding parsing safeguard libraries (io-ts, Zod, Joi, json schema, etc) have become so commonplace that people don't really let implicit coercion occur very often, and thus it doesn't matter most of the time.
Whenever I kick off a new npm init, it's always followed by installing typescript, eslint, and usually Zod before I even write the first line of code. If double equals was removed from ECMAScript, I would likely never notice.
It doesn't matter in the sense that it's a case of "garbage in, garbage out". I have no idea what what `{} + 1` gives you (it's `'[object Object]1'` BTW), but whatever it is doesn't matter because it's a rubbish computation to make.
It would have made more sense to throw an exception, but JavaScript at it's origin was meant to be a simple scripting language. Nowadays with TypeScript it's much less of an issue.
Obviously this isn't everything and not perfect, but a lot of this tedium can be automated away if you have a few good examples of the happy path and some basic tests in place to prevent quick and dirty changes from poking holes in these layers.
Implicit type coercion doesn't matter most of the time? You don't often have bugs because of it?