Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you think the mess (i.e. 50 mixed up mini commits as you work on a feature and iterate on it) is useful history (it usually isn't) then use a different DVCS because git was not designed around this mode of operation and a lot of its advanced features work poorly when applied to such a history.

Alternative DVCSes which support this workflow include: fossil



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: