> Jobs can be completely right about the importance of what he calls “content”, but his aversion to “process” strikes me as short sighted.
Imagine if he wasn't so short sighted the value of the firm he could have created over the long term.
PS. I think you're also right, in that I don't see any aversion to process in Jobs, I see an aversion to contentless process people. Jobs loved a quality process.
Imagine if he wasn't so short sighted the value of the firm he could have created over the long term.
PS. I think you're also right, in that I don't see any aversion to process in Jobs, I see an aversion to contentless process people. Jobs loved a quality process.