Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

THIS!

Seriously... if they retire it, make the backend read-only, that way it can be highly optimized, and ran with minimal costs (from a mammoth company's perspective).

I don't know, make it an interview question and deploy the best answer? They put more effort into tortuting aspirants than to EOL-ing some of their cheap-ass services in a reasonable way.



The problem is that Google infra requires everything running to be new. There is a build horizon of 6 months. Everything built with code older than 6 months is not able to run on Borg. And since Google deprecates many internal infra tools/libraries routinely, a team is required to make sure the service remains up-to-date. Google doesn't want to pay for such maintenance.


This what I'd suspected as pressure to discontinue services that could otherwise virtually maintenance-free at low cost.


In S3, you can implement this with a single bucket, no code at all: objects can cause redirects, using x-amz-website-redirect-location

Since Google buckets don't seem to implement this feature, maybe they should point goo.gl at S3 :-)


Oh cool, I've done this sort of thing (mass redirects) with Lambda@Edge which allows for more flexibility, but probably costs more.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: