Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They can't have their cake and eat it too. When you entrench yourself in a monopoly, there are duties that come with it

There could've been other app stores. There could've been a choice at startup like there is for browsers. There could've been 4 or 5 app stores installed by default whether you're on a Pixel or on a Samsung device.

It is nobody's fault but Google's that they became a gatekeeper with their app store. Ie: How hard open OSes have to fight to de-googlify a phone. How they push to have it installed by default, which forces me to put my apps on the Play store as 99% of users would go there to look for my apps.

Then there are scare screens to fend off the installation of competing app stores. Then once you've actually managed to install a competing app-store like F-Droid, it has to beg you to go into the settings and check some boxes or it won't be able to perform installations properly.



>They can't have their cake and eat it too. When you entrench yourself in a monopoly, there are duties that come with it

I mean, it seems like people want their cake and eat it too. Not Google.

People want no commission, and for Google to spend resources policing the app store.

Since Google open sources Android, Google doesn't make money from the OS itself. They only make money through pre-installed Google apps and the app store.


People would accept all of that as a "fact of life" if a healthy market existed and we noticed this was the best we could do.

People are not fine with an arbitrary number of 30% and no serious competition to go to to find a better service.

If Google finds the demands unreasonable they shouldn't have put themselves in a monopoly position that'd allow them to become gatekeepers




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: