Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I dislike that article/advice because it’s dishonest / downplaying a limitation of ZFS and advocating that people should spend a lot more money, that may likely not be necessary at all.


What limitation is it downplaying? If there are hidden downsides to the proposed solution, I would certainly like to know.

Compared to a RAID setup, this requires a lot less money. It's really good for residential use.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: