Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're inferring a lot that I didn't write or even imply. I'll be clear about my beliefs:

1. I just learned from the article about the fabricated Daisey episode and that TAL started using professional fact checkers only afterward. I was surprised on both counts.

2. I saw your comment that it would be in poor character to discredit TAL's prior reporting on the basis of this one failure.

3. I responded that it would be telling to actually estimate the reliability of earlier episodes because, right now, we're just going off our personal beliefs (and these probably vary widely from person to person).

4. You and I had a back and forth, mainly talking past one another.

5. I think that if we did actually measure the reliability of prior episodes, it would be less than a lot of TAL defenders expect and greater than a lot of TAL doubters expect.

6. As for what's reasonable vs. over correction to take away from the article, that depends largely on your prior beliefs about TAL and how the world functions in general.

Note that point 5, being a product of my prior beliefs about TAL and how the world functions in general, is actually an example of point 6 in action.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: