I'd never heard this particular line. So had to look it up. According to the Wikipedia entry, assuming this happened at all, it:

1. Happened in 2017, when Joe Biden was a private citizen

2. Was rejected with "an emphatic no" by "the Chairman" (Joe Biden)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controvers...

Why then would the Big Guy have been paid?

Why was Hunter paid $500k yearly by a Ukrainian gas company, despite not speaking Ukrainian and having no expertise in the field?

It seems where there is smoke, there’s fire, no?

What about what about what about

What about nick RickJWagner posting on HN?

What's that fairness issue?

The piece might have broadened the scope a bit to remind people of Hunter Bidens escapades, I.e. the $500k no show Ukrainian gas job. Without such information it seems like personal enrichment is something new.

Why? This article is about Trump, the current president. Why drag in an ex-president's son?