To me, it seems like you wrote a lot but never actually answered the question of the person you are responding to. A reminder: the question was does the blade aerosolize fluids. Based on the video (as soon as 10 seconds in) it sure looks like the answer is yes, to a much greater degree than a normal knife.
First, you are not actually correct on the question.
Here, let me quote the question:
"Honest question, does it aerosolize pathogens that cause food-borne illness?"
That is literally not "does it aerosolize fluids", which is what you claim the question is.
My first sentence:
"Interesting question, short answer - almost certainly not any more or less than you are already, and to the degree it does, it almost certainly is making things better and not worse"
How is that not a literal answer?
Again, the question was about aerosolizing pathogens that cause foodborne illness, not just random fluids. So i explained why ultrasonic knives are not going to do that more than normal knife would, and assuming we only care about pathogens cause foodborne illness, will do so much less.
Sure, it can aerosolize lime juice. Lime juice is not a pathogen that causes food borne illness?
If your answer is atually meant to claim it aerosolizes pathogens much more than a normal knife, please cite data or studies or some other form of science. I can give you citations to literally every claim i made. I wrote most of the science reasons.
The video does not show anything related to pathogens.
Otherwise, i think it is you who is not answering the question asked, which was not about fluids?
