Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don’t get your argument here. 10 isn’t a huge number in my book but I don’t know of course what else that entails. I would opt for a secure process change over a soft local workflow restriction that may or may not be followed by all individuals. And I would definitely protect my CI system in the same way than local machines. Depending on the nature of CI these machines can have easy access rights. This really depends how you do CI and how lacks security is.


I'll do soft local workflow restriction right away.

The secure process change might take anywhere from a day to months.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: