Codeberg's uptime is so bad, that it actually makes GitHub look good. ~96.5% over last 2 weeks [1]

[1]: https://status.codeberg.org/status/codeberg

The operate on less than 100_000€/year, so I would cut them some slack ;-) btw. codeberg is not a company, more like a foundation, Verein is the german word.

I fail to see how this is relevant to the point I was making. With uptime being so low, it's not a viable alternative: budget / resources / etc. don't change that fact.

Don't get me wrong — I am glad that they are doing what they're doing, but it's a long way until it becomes a real alternative.

We don't actually know what githubs uptime is because they don't say. If you told me it's less than 96.5, I might believe you, particular for actions.

I'm sure if Codeberg had equivalent resources they'd be good, hard to fault a nonprofit for not benefiting from a trillion dollar multinational corporation. What was GitHub's excuse for their failures?

I am not criticizing Codeberg, I'm just adding context that seems very important from my experience.

As mentioned above — I am glad that they exist and do what they do. However, that doesn't mean I should ignore issues like this.

Are they a profit center yet?

Or just run a self hosted GitLab open source instance? Running it for 6 years now with nearly zero issues and a great CI.

Last time I self hosted GitLab I was greeted with an "Update ASAP" Badge on the admin page basically every week and that has scared me away.