> non-consensual sexual material being generated of them by Grok
They should disable it in the Netherlands in this case since it really sounds like a textbook slander case and the spreader can also be held liable. note: it's not the same as in the US despite using the same word, deepfakes have been proven as slander and this is no different. Especially if you know it's fake by using "AI". There have been several cases of pornographic deep fakes, all of which were taken down quickly, in which the poster/creator was sentenced. The unfortunate issue even of taking posts down quickly is unfortunately the rule which states that if something is on the internet it stays on the internet. The publisher always went free due to acting quickly and not creating it. I would like to see where it goes when both publisher and creator are the same entity, and they do nothing to prevent it.
Yeah this is pretty funny. Seeing all these discussions about section 230 and the American constitution...
Nobody in the Netherlands gives one flying fuck about American laws what GROK is doing violates many Dutch laws. Our parliament actually did it's job and wrote some stuff about revenge porn, deep fakes and artificial CP.
They should disable it in the Netherlands in this case since it really sounds like a textbook slander case and the spreader can also be held liable. note: it's not the same as in the US despite using the same word, deepfakes have been proven as slander and this is no different. Especially if you know it's fake by using "AI". There have been several cases of pornographic deep fakes, all of which were taken down quickly, in which the poster/creator was sentenced. The unfortunate issue even of taking posts down quickly is unfortunately the rule which states that if something is on the internet it stays on the internet. The publisher always went free due to acting quickly and not creating it. I would like to see where it goes when both publisher and creator are the same entity, and they do nothing to prevent it.