How curious that your comment was downvoted! It seems completely appropriate and in line with the discussion.
I think it's time to revisit these discussions and in fact remove Section 230. X is claiming that the Grok CSAM is "user generated content" but why should X have any protection to begin with, be it a human user directly uploading it or using Grok to do this distribution publicly?
The section 230 discussion must return, IMHO. These platforms are out of control.
I think it's time to revisit these discussions and in fact remove Section 230. X is claiming that the Grok CSAM is "user generated content" but why should X have any protection to begin with, be it a human user directly uploading it or using Grok to do this distribution publicly?
The section 230 discussion must return, IMHO. These platforms are out of control.