There is a comparison, even if Kasparov wins it. IMO the best place to start would be the highest tournament performance ratings[1]. Kasparov had five of the top ten at the time the list was compiled, over a ten year span. That's pretty dominant. OTOH, Carlsen's later 8/10 at Pearl Springs 2009 (Category XXI) got him a new record PR of 3002[2]. If we include matches, his current performance against Anand might also rate pretty high.
I'm not saying Carlsen is the greatest ever. I'm just saying comparisons are totally valid.
I'm not saying Carlsen is the greatest ever. I'm just saying comparisons are totally valid.
[1] http://en.chessbase.com/post/the-greatest-che-player-of-all-... [2] http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=52948