It would be nice to not see the harassment word prefaced with "gender-based." This parsing, by Tom, without fuller disclosure of what mistakes were made leads to the conclusion that there was some form of harassment, but that it wasn't put forth in a manner which legally falls into "gender-based," which would make github and Tom (& family) liable for those actions.
I still want to see the dramatization where the guy coder comes in professing his love, gets spurned, then spitefully removes code.
Terms like hostile, gender-based, and discrimination all have pretty specific requirements for proof.
At least HN an move forward unhappily and pull out the "tragic" word describe everything. I'm not sure we all experienced catharsis, but "tragic" will have to do.
I still want to see the dramatization where the guy coder comes in professing his love, gets spurned, then spitefully removes code.
Terms like hostile, gender-based, and discrimination all have pretty specific requirements for proof.
At least HN an move forward unhappily and pull out the "tragic" word describe everything. I'm not sure we all experienced catharsis, but "tragic" will have to do.